Óïn Ursüm
Posts: 1,032
Talossan Since: 3-10-2009
|
Post by Óïn Ursüm on Jan 7, 2013 15:40:25 GMT -6
1-4 për 5a contrâ 5b për 6 contrâ 7 contrâ 8a contrâ 8b contrâ 9 për 10 contrâ 11 contrâ 12-15 për 16 contrâ 17 për 18 contrâ
|
|
Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN
Seneschal
the new Jim Hacker
Posts: 6,635
Talossan Since: 6-25-2004
Dame Since: 9-8-2012
Motto: Expulseascâ, reveneascâ
Baron Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
Duke Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
|
Post by Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN on Jan 7, 2013 18:02:01 GMT -6
A few explanations of my votes: Item 5: a full Constitutional Convention at this stage is unnecessary, and premature. The time for a ConCom will be at the point where we think we have a good majority for declaring The New Republic. Item 8: I explained this before; this is a "half-assed" way of declaring a Republic, which would be useful as a compromise proposal but since it would be rejected anyway, best not to put it on the table yet. Item 9: this is pretty much the same as item 8, a "backdoor" way of declaring a Republic, subject to the same criticism; but I won't oppose it. Item 11: I've spent 15 years as a Talossan and micronationalist opposing the diplomatic-relations game and I'm too old to change now. Item 14: as written, this would prevent my preferred solution of "Gramsci Province". Who's "a politician", anyway? Was Gandhi a politician? Item 16: I'm not sure what the issue here is. The problem with the Appointees isn't that they're also elected politicos, it's that they're appointees, which Item 17 correctly addresses.
|
|
|
Post by Antaglha Xhenerös Somelieir on Jan 7, 2013 18:14:25 GMT -6
16 is ment to stop more that one person from occupying more than one possition of power on a provincial level. Because if one oerson is a cunsterval in one province and a head of government in another. They have too much influence over mulitiple provinces which is unfair.
|
|
|
Post by Moritz Fernaodescu on Jan 7, 2013 18:30:05 GMT -6
Item 1. Per Item 2. Per Item 3. Per Item 4. Per Item 5 a. Contra Item 5 b. Per Item 6. Per Item 7. Per Item 8. a. Per Item 8. b. Contra Item 9. Per Item 10. Per Item 11. Per Item 12. Per Item 13. Per Item 14. Per Item 15. Per Item 16. Per Item 17. Per Item 18. Per
|
|
|
Post by Moritz Fernaodescu on Jan 7, 2013 18:32:04 GMT -6
Item 11 gets a triple per.
|
|
Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN
Seneschal
the new Jim Hacker
Posts: 6,635
Talossan Since: 6-25-2004
Dame Since: 9-8-2012
Motto: Expulseascâ, reveneascâ
Baron Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
Duke Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
|
Post by Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN on Jan 7, 2013 20:04:48 GMT -6
Item 11 gets a triple per. NO FAIR, ONLY ONE PËR PER PERSON!!! ;D
|
|
Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN
Seneschal
the new Jim Hacker
Posts: 6,635
Talossan Since: 6-25-2004
Dame Since: 9-8-2012
Motto: Expulseascâ, reveneascâ
Baron Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
Duke Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
|
Post by Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN on Jan 7, 2013 20:05:39 GMT -6
16 is ment to stop more that one person from occupying more than one possition of power on a provincial level. Because if one oerson is a cunsterval in one province and a head of government in another. They have too much influence over mulitiple provinces which is unfair. But do the Appointees actually have any power? During the post-KR1 era, help me out people who know more history of what happened during the Two States period, have the Appointees ever overridden an elected provincial government?
|
|
|
Post by Antaglha Xhenerös Somelieir on Jan 7, 2013 20:12:16 GMT -6
True but that argument brings into question there relevence. Are they needed if they dont actualy do anything usefull? Why not have a presedential provincial setup instead? This also stops citizens from working in more than one province. Shouldnt citizens just work in the orovince they reside in for fairness? It also gives possiblities for more citizens to get into politics whi h may help us.
|
|
|
Post by Gödafrïeu Válcadác’h on Jan 7, 2013 22:54:11 GMT -6
No. 5 - A All else - abstain
|
|
|
Post by C. Carlüs Xheraltescù on Jan 8, 2013 7:09:11 GMT -6
True but that argument brings into question there relevence. Are they needed if they dont actualy do anything usefull? Why not have a presedential provincial setup instead? This also stops citizens from working in more than one province. Shouldnt citizens just work in the orovince they reside in for fairness? It also gives possiblities for more citizens to get into politics whi h may help us. My proposal to eradicate the position of Cunstaval deals with providing a more presidential set-up for Provinces.
|
|
|
Post by Antaglha Xhenerös Somelieir on Jan 8, 2013 8:20:54 GMT -6
Yeah i know. But m still strongly against people holding more than one posistion of power in the role of a provincial head and cunsterval. I just yhink it unfair.
|
|
Óïn Ursüm
Posts: 1,032
Talossan Since: 3-10-2009
|
Post by Óïn Ursüm on Jan 8, 2013 8:38:19 GMT -6
If the Constitution is passed, the CC will have the freedom to alter this manifesto anyway. Some of the more specific items could be generalized etc. etc.
|
|
|
Post by Moritz Fernaodescu on Jan 8, 2013 12:54:02 GMT -6
Item 11 gets a triple per. NO FAIR, ONLY ONE PËR PER PERSON!!! ;D Yeah my bad, you could say I am a bit përsimistic lately
|
|
Óïn Ursüm
Posts: 1,032
Talossan Since: 3-10-2009
|
Post by Óïn Ursüm on Jan 10, 2013 5:35:50 GMT -6
Here are the results:
Item 1: 5p 1a PASSED Item 2: 5p 1a PASSED Item 3: 5p 1a PASSED Item 4: 5p 1a PASSED Item 5a: 1p 5c FAILED Item 5b: 5p 1c PASSED Item 6: 4p 1c 1a PASSED Item 7: 4p 1c 1a PASSED Item 8a: 3p 2c 1a PASSED Item 8b: 1p 4c 1a FAILED Item 9: 3p 3a PASSED Item 10: 4p 1c 1a PASSED Item 11: 2p 2c 2a FAILED Item 12: 4p 2a PASSED Item 13: 5p 1a PASSED Item 14: 4p 2a PASSED Item 15: 5p 1a PASSED Item 16: 3p 1c 2a PASSED Item 17: 5p 1a PASSED Item 18: 4p 1c 1a PASSED
|
|
Óïn Ursüm
Posts: 1,032
Talossan Since: 3-10-2009
|
Post by Óïn Ursüm on Jan 10, 2013 5:46:16 GMT -6
The question is as follows:
That this Convention adopt the following Manifesto for the next Cosa (subject to future change under the Constitution of the ZRT).
***
Please vote për, contrâ or austanéu. Votes close tomorrow at 6pm GMT.
|
|