What If.... ?

[Deleted]

owenfsf said:

Viteu, you seem to be expecting to speak in lieu of someone else. Damn right I'm picking and choosing - the issue you were pursuing had nothing to do with Xhorxh's original post or my response.

Forgive me for becoming exasperated, but this is ludicrous.

It is hysterical you call it ludicrous. Being as in Xhorxh's initial post, he is talking about how applicants are thrown directly into Talossan politics, which has direct relation to recruiting applicants. When a direct connection is made about what his original post is about, you throw your arms up in the air and call it ludicrous. Trite at best, inane at worst.

[Breneir Itravilatx]

Viteu, why do you have a personal vendetta against Owen? For goodness sake, what is it with you and personal vendettas?

[Deleted]

edieppe said:

Viteu, why do you have a personal vendetta against Owen? For goodness sake, what is it with you and personal vendettas?

I have no personal vendetta with Owen.

You, on the other hand, have a personal vendetta with me. If it wasn't so, you would not have built a campaign attacking the policies I have set forth. I have no personal vendetta against Dreu, but he has proven himself a liar, and I called him out on it. So that is 2 down. But you have consistently attacked me and my policies as well as questioned my integrity accusing me of turning a blind eye to other parties violating my policy (which clear evidence now suggest otherwise) without any proof. You have attempted to defame me and make me look like a liar, and you are surprised that I do not put up with your BS? Wow Breneir, thought you were smarter than that.

[Breneir Itravilatx]

LOL. C'mon Viteu. Do you ever lighten up? You know I was joking and yet you continue with partisan rhetoric. I am currently listening to Massive Attack. Have you ever heard of them?

[Owen Edwards]

vitooliver said:

It is hysterical you call it ludicrous. Being as in Xhorxh's initial post, he is talking about how applicants are thrown directly into Talossan politics, which has direct relation to recruiting applicants. When a direct connection is made about what his original post is about, you throw your arms up in the air and call it ludicrous. Trite at best, inane at worst.

Viteu, I will make myself quite clear, and then I beg you - wait till tomorrow to respond. Calm down mate.

Xhorxh was discussing the general issue of probationary periods and so forth. I responded to that (in as much as I perceived a direct attack upon the LRT).

LRT members - who are not, in fact, the same person as I - then brought up matters involving the CCCP possibly "broosking". This matter is currently with the appropriate authorities and out of our hands, but before it reached that stage you demanded proof. You then took my post on a different matter - on Xhorxh's original post about probationary periods and the implications involved - and used it to attack both myself and the LRT.

There are two very different issues here. You seem to have thoroughly confused the two.

[Deleted]

owenfsf said:

vitooliver said:

It is hysterical you call it ludicrous. Being as in Xhorxh's initial post, he is talking about how applicants are thrown directly into Talossan politics, which has direct relation to recruiting applicants. When a direct connection is made about what his original post is about, you throw your arms up in the air and call it ludicrous. Trite at best, inane at worst.

Viteu, I will make myself quite clear, and then I beg you - wait till tomorrow to respond. Calm down mate.

Xhorxh was discussing the general issue of probationary periods and so forth. I responded to that (in as much as I perceived a direct attack upon the LRT).

LRT members - who are not, in fact, the same person as I - then brought up matters involving the CCCP possibly "broosking". This matter is currently with the appropriate authorities and out of our hands, but before it reached that stage you demanded proof. You then took my post on a different matter - on Xhorxh's original post about probationary periods and the implications involved - and used it to attack both myself and the LRT.

There are two very different issues here. You seem to have thoroughly confused the two.

I actually did not attack you personally. I merely pointed out that the LRT had made accusations that they hadn't backed up, and I was awaiting their response, which did not come until I personally emailed the person whom they claimed it happened to (which I should not have had to do.) As far as what Xhoxh was talking about, he said, and I quote: and convinced 10 or 15 newbies to vote for it?

That statement may be interpreted as being applicants or those freshly granted citizenship. So I am dead on to make the connection. I apologize that part evaded you, however.

[Capt. Sir Mick Preston]

Would y'all prefer to settle this By a Duel?

Or, instead, would everyone give it a rest , at least until the Election is over?

I suggest, in the hope that everyone takes a break, that Lord Hooligan buys everyone a Beer (or Root Beer), and he orders Pizza for all.

Anyone with me?

[Sir Alexandreu Davinescu]

I am in favor of beer.

[Sir Alexandreu Davinescu]

I agree with the handsome Senator Davis. Beer is delicious. See? Consensus!

[Owen Edwards]

I do not mean personal attacks in the sense of "your mother's fat". I mean the implication that I personally sought to avoid answering your question - when I had no ability to answer said question.

My issue had been about desiring an affirmation that the original post was not simply a partisan attack. Up to that point, this is what else had happened: Breneir had indicated the CCCP was possibly involved in broosking, Xhorxh had not denied it, and you had asked for Breneir to bring forward evidence (amidst off topic discussion).

I made my post. You soon after replied with your response to Breneir, using my post as a piece of evidence as to an implied inability to back up the accusation. I took some exception to that.

You may re-read the thread. There is NO connection - and the unpleasant implication that, really, I should have made the connection is not appreciated either.

I don't see this getting us anywhere. The matter over the CCCP is in the relevant hands, whilst my question remains arguably unanswered. You and I have no further need to discuss this, as plainly you are sticking to your guns.

[Deleted]

Yes, there is no need to discuss this any further. I provided a direct quote from the original post and how it may be implied which you have seem to completely disregarded. You have a good night.

[Owen Edwards]

Sigh - let's not get into a "last word" contest.

How are your plans for the Christmas season?

[Deleted]

owenfsf said:

Sigh - let's not get into a "last word" contest.

How are your plans for the Christmas season?

I don't celebrate giftmas. So my plans are to work. and yours?

[Owen Edwards]

I don't really do the gift bit - only to an extent, anyway. Parents, the girlfriend, that sort of level, and small, nice gifts (a book, a plant, etc, not a bajillion euro necklace!). I am a Christian, so I do celebrate that side of the event.

I would like to third the above motion for approval of beer. I personally prefer real ale (google CAMRA).

I so prefer this ending to the thread!

[Sir Alexandreu Davinescu]

I never heard of CAMRA... very interesting. Yes, the macrobrews are generally pretty lousy. I like many of the Sam Adams specialty brews (although some of them are rather artificial), but for the most part smaller breweries have preserved the art. When I feel like really splurging, I buy some Trappist ale for $10 a bottle from the local store and enjoy an exemplary but expensive beer experience.