|
|
Post by Viteu Marcianüs on Jan 28, 2017 13:21:30 GMT -6
As there is no procedure for this, I petition the College of Arms to clarify if my Coat of Arms survived the interregnum re: my citizenship with Talossa, and if my name and Arms, as recorded on the website of the Armory remains valid, or if the grant issued by the Crown on Apr. 20, 2010 was automatically rescinded upon renunciation of my citizenship and I must reapply. If the former, I shall like to resume using my Arms (speech-to-text is faulty). If the latter, I will formally file a proper petition to resume using my previous Arms. |
|
|
|
Post by Alèx Soleighlfred on Jan 29, 2017 0:29:46 GMT -6
I want to second this question for the very same reasons. I actually attempted to ask this question twice already, but no one replied. So I decided to put my arms on and see if someone objects: no one did. But I still wonder about the legality of me using them.
|
|
Sir C. M. Siervicül
Posts: 9,636
Talossan Since: 8-13-2005
Knight Since: 7-28-2007
Motto: Nonnisi Deo serviendum
|
Post by Sir C. M. Siervicül on Feb 3, 2017 19:02:55 GMT -6
As there is no procedure for this, I petition the College of Arms to clarify if my Coat of Arms survived the interregnum re: my citizenship with Talossa I have confirmed with His Majesty that a change of citizenship status has no bearing on the validity of your grant of arms. Unless the arms are affirmatively revoked, you are free to bear them even if no longer a citizen, as far as the College is concerned. I actually attempted to ask this question twice already, but no one replied. I'm sorry your question was overlooked. Did you ask on this forum? |
|
|
|
Post by Alèx Soleighlfred on Feb 4, 2017 0:31:52 GMT -6
I'm sorry your question was overlooked. Did you ask on this forum? I wrongly asked that in the char room, so I think that was my fault. Thank you for clarifications! :) |
|
