Capt. Sir Mick Preston
Capitán of the Zouaves
Posts: 6,511
Talossan Since: 9-21-2006
Knight Since: 10-12-2010
Motto: Cuimhnichibh air na daoine bho'n d'thainig sibh
|
Post by Capt. Sir Mick Preston on Feb 3, 2013 1:34:35 GMT -6
Here is what I need to vote on.
Your opinions? We have 3 Acts on the Oath. We need to choose one, that We will support, and that you want me tp vote for.
Please comment?
44RZ26 - The Early Bird Catches the Worm Act
44RZ27 - The Different Promise Act
44RZ28 - The People's Oath Act
44RZ29 - The Okay, Promise THIS Act
44RZ30 - The End to Military Governorships Amendment
|
|
Capt. Sir Mick Preston
Capitán of the Zouaves
Posts: 6,511
Talossan Since: 9-21-2006
Knight Since: 10-12-2010
Motto: Cuimhnichibh air na daoine bho'n d'thainig sibh
|
Post by Capt. Sir Mick Preston on Feb 17, 2013 21:11:35 GMT -6
OK, anyone?
|
|
|
|
Post by M.T. Patritz da Biondeu on Feb 18, 2013 16:10:01 GMT -6
Didn't even see you post this!
44RZ26 - The Early Bird Catches the Worm Act - PER
44RZ27 - The Different Promise Act - CON
44RZ28 - The People's Oath Act - CON
44RZ29 - The Okay, Promise THIS Act - CON
44RZ30 - The End to Military Governorships Amendment - PER
|
|
Capt. Sir Mick Preston
Capitán of the Zouaves
Posts: 6,511
Talossan Since: 9-21-2006
Knight Since: 10-12-2010
Motto: Cuimhnichibh air na daoine bho'n d'thainig sibh
|
Post by Capt. Sir Mick Preston on Feb 19, 2013 23:00:50 GMT -6
My votes, and reasons:
On the matter of 44RZ26 - The Early Bird Catches the Worm Act.
I will have to vote CONTRÂ. I expressed my concerns about this Bill when it was in the Hooper, and I still have those concerns. I do not see why we need to change the current requirements. Those that have not reached the age of 14 can still participate if they wish - there is no bar to that. By the "Whereas" sections of this Act attest to the limitations of those under the age of 14, and the requirements of being able to post on Witt are that one that must have reached the age of 13, this bill really doesn't change anything.
On the matter of 44RZ27 - The Different Promise Act I vote CONTRÂ.
If it makes a prospective citizen "uncomfortable" to take an Oath of Citizenship - Then perhaps the Kingdom isn't the place for them. It shouldn't be a "check box" where you state "I agree to the terms of Service".
On the matter of 44RZ28 - The People's Oath Act I vote CONTRÂ. I had to scratch my head on this one. Why re we taking a Poll, and then regardless of the outcome, defining what will happen before that Poll is taken? ESPECIALLY when they are "Non- binding"? Why bother?
Also - I don't think that taking a one-off , non binding Poll should be passed into law.
On the matter of 44RZ29 - The Okay, Promise THIS Act I vote PËR. If we have to change the Oath, then this is the one I can support. It's a Kingdom, ipso facto- new Citizens should recognize this, and there for agree to support it.
On the matter of 44RZ30 - The End to Military Governorships Amendment I vote PËR. I have to agree with Senator Holmes on the Bill.
|
|
