Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN
Seneschal
the new Jim Hacker
Posts: 6,635
Talossan Since: 6-25-2004
Dame Since: 9-8-2012
Motto: Expulseascâ, reveneascâ
Baron Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
Duke Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
|
Post by Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN on Mar 11, 2012 22:03:05 GMT -6
Since it seems there are no amendments offered to the Reunision Declaration currently before the Republic's General Assembly, it should be passed within 10 days. After that, it will be put to referendum. And if that succeeds, once the new territory is formally created (by act of the Ziu, if I'm reading right?) the Republic will be formally wound up and a collective application will be made for citizenship in that territory.
|
|
|
Post by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu on Mar 11, 2012 22:14:47 GMT -6
Is it a problem that the plan we will actually have varies slightly from what you formally propose? As I recall, the draft at the Republic varies by canton 143, which will now be going to M-M.
|
|
Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN
Seneschal
the new Jim Hacker
Posts: 6,635
Talossan Since: 6-25-2004
Dame Since: 9-8-2012
Motto: Expulseascâ, reveneascâ
Baron Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
Duke Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
|
Post by Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN on Mar 11, 2012 22:28:25 GMT -6
The motion calls for a new territory "along the lines of" the map as proposed, so no amendment to the resolution was deemed necessary. The current map, indicating a two-canton Fiôvâ Province, is now the basis for the Republicans to make our decision. Someone grumbled about the panhandle poking into M-M, but I don't see that as a major concern.
|
|