|
|
Post by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu on Apr 28, 2011 4:39:53 GMT -6
I vote against the proposal, and apologize for my delay.
|
|
|
|
Post by Istefan Lorentzescu on Apr 30, 2011 21:39:15 GMT -6
Presenting Constitution Petition to the king as required in the org Law
RUMP 4 Sir Mick Preston
RUMP 3 S:reu Alexander Davis against
PPT 3 Istefan Lorentzescu for
As this Vote is a draw I believe the the Motion Still lapses.
|
|
|
|
Post by Istefan Lorentzescu on Apr 30, 2011 21:44:04 GMT -6
I believe the only other matter is the updating of our Provincial page and a page listing the make up of previous M-M Assemblies at least the 5 assemblies since the use of our current constitution.
|
|
|
|
Post by Istefan Lorentzescu on Apr 30, 2011 21:53:02 GMT -6
Does anyone have any further business for the Consideration of the assembly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu on May 1, 2011 18:02:41 GMT -6
I don't think I have anything else  I'll get those things updated soon - I already have the new bill and a template for the past assemblies. |
|
|
|
Post by Istefan Lorentzescu on May 2, 2011 16:01:37 GMT -6
Thank you S:r Davis
|
|
|
|
Post by Istefan Lorentzescu on May 23, 2011 5:52:54 GMT -6
Members of this Great Assembly
I will be working/holidaying as a Massage Therapist on a charter boat from the 1 June 2011 through to 23 June 2011 without Internet access during this time. I wish to request a leave of absence from the Assembly .
Regards
Istefan Lorentzescu
M-M Grand General Secretary
MC 42nd Cosa
|
|
|
|
Post by Martì Prevuost on Jun 3, 2011 12:48:13 GMT -6
I do not think we want a Cunstaval - those are for inactive and silly provinces, not ours. And personally I have said that I believe that the King's silence equals consent when it comes to our constitution - I think it's best to err in such cases on the people's mandate - but I would be willing to consider other options, such as a petition to our monarch to ratify our constitution. As for the list of previous assemblies, that's a great idea! As GSU (Grand Specific Undersecretary) I think this is my responsibility, so I will get on it this week. A visiting chap from the Province stumbles into the Assembly Chamber and gently inquires of his distinguished representative: Since OrgLaw mandates the Monarch establish a Cunstaval for each province, and our Provincial Constitution also requires said appointment, why do you believe we don't need one? And why do you believe Cunstavals are only for inactive and silly provinces? If you believe so strongly that a Cunstaval is not necessary to good governance, perhaps you might submit language to your Parliamentary representative for modification of OrgLaw? And he stumbles away again, Mag |
|
|
|
Post by Istefan Lorentzescu on Jun 21, 2011 23:03:52 GMT -6
I am pleased to announce I have made it back safely from my working Holiday. Does any one know what has happened to S:r Davis.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu on Jun 24, 2011 20:51:21 GMT -6
Sorry about that, S:reu. It's been a busy couple of months! I'm still here.
S:reu Prevoust, thank you for your question! I believe that we do not need a Cunstaval because we govern ourselves effectively. I am actually an agitator for greater-provincial-rights-for-Maritiimi-Maxhestic, or an "awesomist" (BAM! new term created). I believe that the longer we go without a Cunstaval and continue to do as well as we have, the better. M-M is a famously democratic province since we did away with that whole dictatorship thing, and that makes us special!
Submitting legislation like that is a good idea, but only in time. We're building our case with these very discussions.
|
|
|
|
Post by Martì Prevuost on Jun 25, 2011 7:59:34 GMT -6
Lieutenant Davis - Welcome Back!!
I trust all is well with you and somewhat ashamedly admit my personal benefit by your absence, having been appointed by the Prime Minister as an MC to fill 10 of your vacated seats.
Granted, seeing as how M-M is such a wonderfully independent province and a true example of provincial self-determination, perhaps we don't NEED a consuval. But (again, here's my big but) seeing as how it is mandated by OrgLaw, doesn't it stand to reason that one should be appointed, regardless of how needed s/he may be?
v/r,
MAG
|
|
|
|
Post by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu on Jun 25, 2011 19:21:32 GMT -6
And if the King does decide to appoint one, we certainly will not throw him or her out. But if it isn't important to the King, then it's certainly not important to us. Perhaps I speak only for myself, but I think that my constituents here represent the thriving impulse towards democracy that has helped propel our province into its position at the top and given it its supervisory role towards our subprovince of Cezembre.
|
|
|
|
Post by Martì Prevuost on Jun 25, 2011 20:19:26 GMT -6
Agreed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu on Jun 29, 2011 3:45:53 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by Istefan Lorentzescu on Jun 29, 2011 6:59:32 GMT -6
S:r Davis
Thanks for getting this page together on our Local history and past assemblies.
|
|
