|
Post by Dréu Gavárþic'h on Jun 2, 2008 14:14:55 GMT -6
Okay, I nominate Viteu for Chair of the Convention with the hope that he will move things along a little.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2008 14:32:52 GMT -6
I accept the nomination. John? Trotxa? Are you both still there?
|
|
|
Post by Dréu Gavárþic'h on Jun 2, 2008 16:11:10 GMT -6
I would highly recommend that you email those two. For, as we know, they are not very witt-active.
|
|
Trotxâ
Talossan since 10-17-2005; Knight since 11-5-2006
Deo duce, ferro comitante
Posts: 1,574
|
Post by Trotxâ on Jun 3, 2008 0:43:48 GMT -6
I would highly recommend that you email those two. For, as we know, they are not very witt-active. The current chair thanks Gavárþic'h for his slam. Even the most active of us can't compete with 2086 messages in 291 days. I'm offering what I can. What few moments of time I've had recently have all been dedicated to the uproar over the Senats. Again, I offer my apologies that my condition has continued longer than expected. The appropriate next step should have been to ask for my resignation BEFORE finding a replacement. If the people of Vuode really feel that our provincial constitutional convention is a race to be won, then by all means press on. When those of you with unlimited time for Wittenberg chatter decide to forgo the opportunity to involve other citizens with more limited availability, you are saying that you don't want us to participate. That hardly seems like a sound basis for a governing document. One wonders what kind of time-sensitive plots Gavárþic'h has up his sleeve. I guess we'll all find out, and quickly. Thanks anyway, Sir T
|
|
|
Post by Dréu Gavárþic'h on Jun 3, 2008 5:16:14 GMT -6
I did not mean to "slam" you. I simply meant that V should email you and McGarry, it probably came out harsher than expected though. Sorry!
As for a "race." I don't think that it's too much to ask for some kind of progress to be made after two months of waiting. Are we really asking too much Sir T?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2008 22:03:06 GMT -6
I would highly recommend that you email those two. For, as we know, they are not very witt-active. The current chair thanks Gavárþic'h for his slam. Even the most active of us can't compete with 2086 messages in 291 days. I'm offering what I can. What few moments of time I've had recently have all been dedicated to the uproar over the Senats. Again, I offer my apologies that my condition has continued longer than expected. The appropriate next step should have been to ask for my resignation BEFORE finding a replacement. If the people of Vuode really feel that our provincial constitutional convention is a race to be won, then by all means press on. When those of you with unlimited time for Wittenberg chatter decide to forgo the opportunity to involve other citizens with more limited availability, you are saying that you don't want us to participate. That hardly seems like a sound basis for a governing document. One wonders what kind of time-sensitive plots Gavárþic'h has up his sleeve. I guess we'll all find out, and quickly. Thanks anyway, Sir T Sir T, You are GROSSLY out of line here. Dreu has every right to tell me to email you, your witt activity has been rather limited. Moreover, your activity in this very convention has been limited at best. We all understand you have real life issues to attend to, but you didn't come here and inform us, you sent someone in. If you couldn't do the job, you should have resigned early on. You owe Dreu an apology here, at the very least you owe the Convention an apology. V
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2008 22:09:06 GMT -6
I did not mean to "slam" you. I simply meant that V should email you and McGarry, it probably came out harsher than expected though. Sorry! As for a "race." I don't think that it's too much to ask for some kind of progress to be made after two months of waiting. Are we really asking too much Sir T? no need to apologize, you're not out of line in this instance.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2008 11:31:57 GMT -6
Sir T,
I merely wanted to point out that you validated Dreu's post. I still expect an apology to either Dreu or the convention for your outburst and lack of attention.
|
|