Or in this thread, until the 21st of the month, at 19h30 TST.
Senators are allowed to create a single thread in the Senate chamber to post all of the Senate Votes that are not cast in this thread. Any votes not posted either using the form above, the current thread or the Senate thread might be ignored and void. Please do not vote by email or private messages.
When you vote, do not indicate any conditions which may make it sound like this vote isn't final: you can always change your vote later.
Please do not vote by email: We've had problems with email votes being caught in the spam filter.
All nominated Cosa Members and Senators have been emailed
Post by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu on Sept 10, 2018 18:42:42 GMT -6
As to RZ4, The Royal Civil Service (Establishment) Bill, I vote për. I do not wholly agree with this, but it seems a general improvement.
As to RZ5, Budget for the 52nd Cosa, I abstain.
As to RZ6, An Act to Remove Béneditsch Ardpresteir from the Uppermost Cort of Talossa, I vote contrâ. It is foolish to impeach a justice over some of these things. We're impeaching him for failing to appear in cases in which he didn't need to appear? Nonsense.
RZ4 - Për RZ5 - Për RZ6 - It is foolish to buy into Alex's gas lighting. This bill is whether Talossa will tolerate a Justice of the Uppermost Cort making homophobic jokes. And at this point, Alex is more concerned with keeping a party member on the UC than doing the right thing. I vote PËR. And I do so to move passed this sorry episode.
Post by Þon Txoteu É. Davinescu on Sept 14, 2018 1:30:47 GMT -6
RZ4 - Për RZ5 - Për RZ6 - Për
VoC - Yes
The Most Honourable General Txoteu É. Davinescu La Mhinistrà dels Afaes Útphätseschti Foreign Affairs Minister of the Kingdom of Talossa ____________________________________________________ Member of the 52nd Cosa Commandant, Royal Talossan Marine Corps
I made a rookie mistake and voted in the Cosa thread instead of here. Please please forgive me! I'll just duplicate here just in case.
For the record, votes in this thread by Senators are just as valid as votes cast in the Senate room, though I suppose it is more traditional and possibly more orderly (although that is not for me to decide) to post in the Senate room. Duplicating was therefore not strictly necessary, but it always wise to make sure when in doubt. (It is certainly better than not doing so and then later finding out that your vote was invalid.) Your efforts to make sure are therefore appreciated. I just want to make clear that Senators are allowed to vote here.
V: I've had about seven pieces published in a monthly LGBT legal publication since the summer while working no less than 60 hours a week. My apologies for disappearing for a bit.
Dec 12, 2018 17:15:38 GMT -6