|
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2010 12:32:54 GMT -6
In this thread I aim to talk about how I will vote and will gladly listen to all the citizens thoughts on specific legislation. Please be respectful. I also want to note that my conscience is the final authority on how I vote but I will take into consideration everyone's voices. In other words, I may have an idea early on but my mind may change and I will explain it to the province. Furthermore, we may not always be in agreement and I may vote out of the majority at times but will never hold back my reasons as to why I'm voting the way I am.
May 2010 CE Clerk-
on 41RZ01- PER
on 41RZ-RS1- PER.
I am confident that there shouldn't be much debate over this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eðo Grischun on May 5, 2010 14:25:55 GMT -6
Senator, No debate here. Although I can't vote on 41RZ-RS1, I am in complete support over Lilly being approved to be the Chancellor of the Bar. And thanks for the vote on my bill  PS: Although I do have a (slight) problem with Senators voting per conscience as I believe they are elected to act as representatives of thier constituents before all else, I look forward to active engagment in discussions like this on future bills. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2010 10:01:47 GMT -6
A little late-- but here goes.
41RZ2- PER This was my bill and I have been pushing for its passage. We need some of the roles codified. there is nothing wrong and no real extra work outside of merely posting the link provided to the website. No big deal.
41RZ3- CONTRA I feel as if this would over complicate matters. In fact, it could lead to more embarrassing as then the person is open to the full ammunition of people who can ask them any question they please. It's an unnecessary hurdle.
41RZ4 - PER - no real reason not to.
41RZ5- PER - another one of my bills and I think an important one. Senators will finally have some level of accountability. Also, both groups are directly involved, the province they represent and the people with whom they work. I think this is a fair amendment and will bring the Senate closer in line with the Cosa.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2010 12:32:38 GMT -6
41RZ8:
Contra
-- Because cake is only meant to be enjoyed by the French peasantry. Being as we are not French peasantry, I do not believe Madam Antoinette would support us eating cake. We should not be redefining cake!
41RZ12:
Contra
-- Many nations around the world restrict the ability to hold multiple citizenships. Many nations around the world also restrict the ability to be involved in certain clubs. I think the law shall remain. I've yet to hear convincing arguments otherwise.
41RZ9:
Contra
-- Talossa needs to arm itself against Christian extremist.
41RZ10: PER-- It makes sense.
41RZ11: PER -- I believe it should be a province. My position has been consistent since becoming a Talossan four years ago.
|
|
