Nikϋ
Citizen since 1-16-2006
Posts: 138
|
Post by Nikϋ on Sept 28, 2008 4:06:11 GMT -6
RUMP across the board, and a polite UC.
|
|
Ian da Bitour
Talossan since 3-11-2006
President of Royal Bank and Post
Posts: 382
|
Post by Ian da Bitour on Sept 28, 2008 5:40:28 GMT -6
Cosa: CCCP
Etats: CCCP
Senats: da Bitour
38RZ10: UC
|
|
Çesli da Chilseu
Cunstaval to Vuode
Citizen of Talossa
Posts: 506
Talossan Since: 9-28-2008
|
Post by Çesli da Chilseu on Sept 28, 2008 7:11:14 GMT -6
1. DPD
2. DPD
3. DPD
4. Uc
|
|
Sir X. Pol Briga
Talossan since 11-10-2005
Knight since 12-26-2009
59 is an important number - keep it prime in the thoughts of Talossa
Posts: 1,227
|
Post by Sir X. Pol Briga on Sept 28, 2008 22:34:32 GMT -6
RUMP across the board, and a polite UC. Niku - great to see other Cézembreans are now polling, however there is not to my knowledge a RUMP candidate for Senats, and I'm sure that Ian will join me in respect for your choice not to vote for a Senator, but if you actually meant to (as perhaps Eugene or Tony may also have meant to) I think the SoS would allow you to express your thoughts one way or the other. XPB |
|
Hooligan
Squirrel King of Arms; Cunstaval to Maricopa
Posts: 7,325
Talossan Since: 7-12-2005
Motto: PRIMA CAPIAM POCULA
Baron Since: 11-20-2005
Count Since: 9-8-2012
|
Post by Hooligan on Sept 28, 2008 22:37:36 GMT -6
Submitted ballots cannot be changed or amended, of course, but.... By voting for the RUMP for part 2, Niku indicates that he voted for the candidate that was endorsed for that Senate seat by that party. (That's you, XPB -- as shown on the papers filed with the Chancery and on this page, the RUMP endorsed you for that Senate seat.) It has always been the case that anyone failing to vote explicitly for a Senatorial candidate is officially voting for whichever person was endorsed for that office by whichever party the person voted for in part 1 (Cosa) of the ballot. This is explained on the ballot. This is in fact why parties are asked to make Senatorial endorsements, so that voters can choose only a party if they wish to do so, and allow the party's endorsement to decide any senatorial vote they cast. Hooligan |
|
Capt. Sir Mick Preston
Capitán of the Zouaves
Posts: 6,511
Talossan Since: 9-21-2006
Knight Since: 10-12-2010
Motto: Cuimhnichibh air na daoine bho'n d'thainig sibh
|
Post by Capt. Sir Mick Preston on Sept 28, 2008 22:45:10 GMT -6
(just a point of interest)
I wait until the last day to fill in any non-specified Senate Votes.
But if they vote for a party, they vote for that party's recommendation.
|
|
Capt. Sir Mick Preston
Capitán of the Zouaves
Posts: 6,511
Talossan Since: 9-21-2006
Knight Since: 10-12-2010
Motto: Cuimhnichibh air na daoine bho'n d'thainig sibh
|
Post by Capt. Sir Mick Preston on Sept 29, 2008 15:21:15 GMT -6
This is a test, to see if it helps direct people to where the voting is going on.
|
|
Sir X. Pol Briga
Talossan since 11-10-2005
Knight since 12-26-2009
59 is an important number - keep it prime in the thoughts of Talossa
Posts: 1,227
|
Post by Sir X. Pol Briga on Sept 29, 2008 22:32:20 GMT -6
Submitted ballots cannot be changed or amended, of course, but.... By voting for the RUMP for part 2, Niku indicates that he voted for the candidate that was endorsed for that Senate seat by that party. (That's you, XPB -- as shown on the papers filed with the Chancery and on this page, the RUMP endorsed you for that Senate seat.) It has always been the case that anyone failing to vote explicitly for a Senatorial candidate is officially voting for whichever person was endorsed for that office by whichever party the person voted for in part 1 (Cosa) of the ballot. This is explained on the ballot. This is in fact why parties are asked to make Senatorial endorsements, so that voters can choose only a party if they wish to do so, and allow the party's endorsement to decide any senatorial vote they cast. Hooligan Thank you for the clarification, as at talossa.proboards32.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=3642&page=1 at least at the moment it shows a blank spot for Niku under the Senats vote (as well as for Eugene and Tony) --- which has been further clarified by the SoS as being normal procedure. |
|
|
|
Post by Sévastain Bustany on Sept 30, 2008 8:15:18 GMT -6
Cosâ es Senäts: PP
Referendüm: ÜC
|
|
|
|
Post by Xen Gryphon on Oct 1, 2008 14:52:49 GMT -6
Rump all the way....to the Rumpus Room...hehehe.
And yes to the further separation of powers amendment.
|
|
|
|
Post by Albrec'ht Cheleir on Oct 2, 2008 20:09:57 GMT -6
RUMP all the way as well...may we sit on our asses lol (and donkeys and burrows too)
UC on the other thing
|
|
|
|
Post by Bruce Jones on Oct 6, 2008 11:20:51 GMT -6
After much thought and personal torment, I vote:
RUMP
Ventrutx
RUMP
ÜC
|
|
|
|
Post by Catrina Þestra on Oct 9, 2008 8:18:02 GMT -6
Cosa: RUMP
Etats: RUMP
Senats: da Bitour
38RZ10: ÜC
|
|
|
|
Post by Princess Nellie on Oct 9, 2008 20:48:37 GMT -6
I vote: RUMP Ventrutx RUMP Üc
|
|
|
|
Post by Al Simmerman on Oct 12, 2008 18:15:10 GMT -6
pp across the board
yes to the Organic Law
|
|
