|
Post by Vitxalmour Conductour on Dec 27, 2018 14:33:24 GMT -6
I actually support the idea of a more robust honour system, but when you display a menu with prices, you aren't bettering any system. You are cheapening It with purchased honours, design and intent be damned. Heck, I'm notneven against an honour being bestowed on an individual for nothing more than posessing a surplus of currency, but I think that should,be a case by case matter. Presenting a menu of prices makes the whole endeavor meaningless. Accusing criticism of details to be stubborn opposition to the very idea of change is noy the way to win support. I support change. Likely more rapid and profound change than you. I support your general concept. I am on your side. But that detail has to go. Mean it or not, that says to the poor among us that they are not as worthy or valid. And we get enough of that.
|
|
|
Post by Þon Txoteu É. Davinescu on Dec 27, 2018 15:12:56 GMT -6
And I completely understand that. I also apologize for jumping to conclusions. I would be fine in tweaking the system how ever might best make it work and just wanted to more give an idea of structure and form.
The first step is to get the mechanics in place to form such Orders, hence the Chancellery, and use that to ensure that we can develop a more robust system that doesn’t cheapen the nation’s Honours System
|
|