|
Post by Marti-Pair Furxheir S.H. on Aug 12, 2014 18:16:07 GMT -6
The court is confused as to whether the Chancery is seeking an appeal when it has, apparently, reversed itself on the issue of the renunciation and would like to hear from the Chancery's counsel as to its plans. Can I answer this question? I have posted the reversal only because compelled by the court. Did I misunderstand how the appeal process works? Perhaps. But I was asked by my counsel to post this while waiting for appeal. Reversing the renunciation is not the same thing as admitting the first proclamation was wrong.
|
|
Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă
Puisne (Associate) Justice of the Uppermost Court
Fraichetz dels punts, es non dels mürs
Posts: 4,063
Talossan Since: 9-23-2012
|
Post by Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă on Aug 12, 2014 18:21:10 GMT -6
The Chancery did not have to issue any kind of Writ to reinstate S:reu Kildow as the original Writ was blocked and not in force thereby appearing, at least legally, as if the original Writ was never issued in the first place. Also, S:reu Secretary of State, you stated "reversing the renunciation" but it should be clear that the Chancery is not reversing the renunciation because it can only reverse its own actions (the Writ of Termination, not the renunciation of S:reu Kildow).
|
|
|
Post by Marti-Pair Furxheir S.H. on Aug 12, 2014 19:09:53 GMT -6
The Chancery did not have to issue any kind of Writ to reinstate S:reu Kildow as the original Writ was blocked and not in force thereby appearing, at least legally, as if the original Writ was never issued in the first place. Also, S:reu Secretary of State, you stated "reversing the renunciation" but it should be clear that the Chancery is not reversing the renunciation because it can only reverse its own actions (the Writ of Termination, not the renunciation of S:reu Kildow). Oh... then I didn't present the right text. I humbly apologize for that and will try to amend it tomorrow.
|
|
|
Post by Magniloqueu Épiqeu da Lhiun on Aug 12, 2014 19:33:44 GMT -6
If you allow me, your Honour!
You misunderstand, Mr Secretary! What you need to do is, well nothing. Regard the situation thus:
ESB has necer renounced, a Writ of Termination was never issued, but all indications that he ever was a citizen in the Kingdom have been deleted due to a malfunction. What you need to do is re-enter ESB to the citizenship rolls and databases.
|
|
Owen Edwards
Puisne Justice
Posts: 1,400
Talossan Since: 12-8-2007
|
Post by Owen Edwards on Aug 12, 2014 19:41:54 GMT -6
Thankyou to the Cort.
Chancery's counsel - thanks - keep us informed.
|
|
|
Post by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu on Aug 12, 2014 20:37:33 GMT -6
Your Honour, I advised my client to issue notice officially adhering to your Honour's ruling, since no stay in the ruling was granted and you gave 48 hours in which to comply. To err on the side of caution, we wanted to eliminate any ambiguity in the question of adherence to the ruling. It was not intended to convey further legal force, but in fulfillment of the injunction. If your Honour would like it stricken or would like to suggest better wording, I believe the Chancery would more than open to that.
We still intend to appeal.
|
|
Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă
Puisne (Associate) Justice of the Uppermost Court
Fraichetz dels punts, es non dels mürs
Posts: 4,063
Talossan Since: 9-23-2012
|
Post by Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă on Aug 13, 2014 7:34:10 GMT -6
The Court is satisfied with the explanation and thanks all parties for their time. This case is adjourned.
|
|
Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă
Puisne (Associate) Justice of the Uppermost Court
Fraichetz dels punts, es non dels mürs
Posts: 4,063
Talossan Since: 9-23-2012
|
Post by Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă on Dec 1, 2014 16:26:43 GMT -6
This Cort has received notification that the defendant has satisfactorily fulfilled a portion of his sentence. Specifically, S:reu Kildow has paid the monetary fine imposed upon him by this Cort and is so stating this for the public record.
|
|