|
Post by Eðo Grischun on Aug 1, 2009 15:21:31 GMT -6
Complete agreement with Drue. The whole idea, if you read the constitution from start to finish, is that the province can be governed effectively from day one and can be governed by a proportional percantage of leadership, and yes there is room for expansion as the citizenship of our province grows.
and again, the judiciary has been discussed.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2009 13:40:04 GMT -6
Actually Dreu, YOU go back and read what is there. There is "consideration" but nothing solidified. "Well, we could do this..."
My idea does create an immediate working government and one that does not really have to change "down the line." Your idea is fine for a provisional and transitional government. I do find it funny, however, you say 4 or 5 people max yet if you count the areas of government I'm creating, there are only 5 spots. So that argument fails.
Again, I repeat, the question of judiciary has not been full discussed nor has an adequate conclusion been reached. Do not be so dismissive.
I would suggest we throw out both ideas and start from scratch if neither side is okay with the other side's. I am not comfortable with what you have put forth (although I appreciate the effort.)
Both systems are ready for to be immediately implemented. I just feel mine is better equipped to stand the test of time. You don't like mine, I don't like yours. So let us work together on something we can all agree on.
The end result on your constitution, unfortunately, I will not support it. Period. The options we have in front of us now are:
1) You try to implement it and we go into a battle as lines will be drawn.
2) I try to implement mine and we fight about it.
3) We scrap both plans and work together with all active vuodians to design a government that will not have to change much as the province grows.
I choose option 3. We're not going to get anywhere by going with Option 1 or 2. Being as we're all stubborn and don't want to see the shortcomings of our proposed system (although neither of you have given me the benefit of discussion my idea, which I have generously afford to you) let us start over.
P.S.
Do not condescend me Evoart, I read your constitution from start to finish about five times. I do not feel that it creates a strong enough regime. I do not support merely putting a transitional regime in place. I want something that can stand the test of time.
|
|
|
Post by Eðo Grischun on Aug 20, 2009 3:42:22 GMT -6
Where do we currently stand? Next steps?
|
|
|
Post by Dréu Gavárþic'h on Aug 30, 2009 13:10:26 GMT -6
Alright, let's get going again. Shame V can't be here! Come back to us on when you're ready V.
Éovart- ball's in your court.
|
|
|
Post by Eðo Grischun on Aug 30, 2009 15:08:28 GMT -6
Im happy to go forward with the Constitution that we wrote Drue. But, I'll have another look over it just to see if anything jumps out at me as needing changed.
|
|
|
Post by Dréu Gavárþic'h on Sept 1, 2009 9:50:06 GMT -6
(Quick note: it's Dreu or, preferably, Dréu, but not Drue, that would be pronounced DROO-eh while my name is pronounced DRAY-oo, thanks! )
|
|