The Seneschál Election Amendment

[Ian Plätschisch]

Feb 26, 2020 7:05:47 GMT -6 Viteu Marcianüs said:

Feb 25, 2020 19:03:58 GMT -6 Ian Plätschisch said:

Can you get rid of the lettered subsections so it is just one section?

Why are you so against subsections? They're actually quite useful and easy to follow if done right. One large section is cumbersome to read. 

If the entire Organic Law was written in that style it would be fine, but I think it looks weird for a certain style to appear in one or two places and nowhere else.

[Viteu Marcianüs]

Okay, sorry, I misunderstood. I can get behind consistency.

[Lüc da Schir]

Feb 26, 2020 4:05:08 GMT -6 Magniloqueu Épiqeu da Lhiun said:

Under that act, who is an “eligible person”?

Uhh, in my mind when I wrote this:

- where it refers to the Seneschal, eligible = not disqualified in any other statutory/organic provision (mostly because of holding another position)

- where it refers to MCs, eligible = not disqualified, duly nominated by an authorized party official (presently: leaders) and registered by the SoS in the Database.

Either or both instances can be changed for clarity (or entirely dropped).

[Açafat del Val]

I reiterate my earlier concerns. As much as this bill has good intentions, and as much as I support the principle which it tries to achieve, if it became law today then our OrgLaw and process would be a mess. This needs a rewrite, and it needs to come with simultaneous and complimentary changes to other sections of the OrgLaw and El Lexhatx.