|
Post by Gödafrïeu Válcadác’h on Jul 2, 2019 20:47:31 GMT -6
I suspect the more likely outcome is that it would encourage people not to engage until closer to the end. I assume most legislators only have a certain amount of time they can spend on proofing bills; messing with the timetable would probably only change when that time is spent. If this is the case, that people never look at bills until they are just about to become law, why do we bother with the Hopper? If the King has the power to unilaterally torpedo legislation, he has the reponsibility to be a veto-check on himself, vising the Hopper often and pointing out where bills are wonky. He is a very rules-maven, and improvement in this aspect of his Talossanity would serve the country well.
|
|