|
Post by Viteu Marcianüs on Sept 20, 2018 11:35:25 GMT -6
Voluntarily withdrawn without prejudice. In the Matter of VITEU MARCIANÜS PETITIONER,
v GLÜC DA DHI, as SECRETARY OF STATE, and INDIVIDUALLY. RESPONDENT. To the Clerk of the Cort and the Esteemed Justices of the Uppemost Cort of the Kingdom of Talossa: I, Viteu Marcianüs, pro se, do hereby petition this august Cort to enjoin the Secretary of State from intervening in the Organically permissive debate occurring in any forum functioning as the Organically mandated "Hopper." To wit, the Organic Law mandates that Glüc da Dhi , as Secretary of State, "administer[] a public venue for the inspection of legislative proposals before they become bills, 'The Hopper'" (Org.L.IX1). Further, the First Covenant enumerates that "(n)o law shall exist abridging the freedom of thought, belief, opinion(,) and expression, including ... other media of communication(.) Censorship shall never exist in Talossa, every person may freely speak, write(,) and publish his (or her) sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the libelous abuse of that right" (Org.L.IX.I). It is well-settled law across common-law States, as well as civil-law States, that Parliamentarians enjoy certain parliamentary immunity, which, among other things, bars State action against all speech made during debate in the State's Legislature ( see e.g. German Constitution Art. 46 ["At no time may a Member be subjected to court proceedings or disciplinary action or otherwise called to account outside of the Bundestag for a vote case or for any speech or debate in the Bundestag or in any of its committees(.)"); United Kingdom Parliamentary Privilege, 1689 Bill of Rights, R v Chaytor, CTB v News GRoup Newspapers Ltd, (2011) EWHC 1232 QB; U.S. Const. art. I, § 6, clause 1 ("(F)or any or Debate in either House (of Congress), (the Congressperson) shall not be questioned"; Franch Constitution, article 26). Whereas, in a LAWFUL debate on the Hopper, I referred to another Member of the Cosa by their nonTalossan name, as a protected right under the Organic Law and under long-established legal doctrines the world over; and the Secretary of State has taken inOrganic action to censor my speech and subject to inorganic State Censorship by the Secretary of State, by editing my posts in the debate to conform to his standard of public etiquette, thereby inhibiting me from arguing with nuance by choosing specific language, under a rule of the overarching Talossan forum that has no Organic or statutory predicate, in what can only be described as inOrganic Censorship, from September 6, 2018 to present. Therefore, I request that this Cort issue a permanent injunction against the Chancery preventing him from editing further posts in the Hopper or the Ziu, to award monetary damages to petitioner for respondent acting under of color of law to abuse his power as a State official to deprive another of their Organic Rights, to award costs, and for other equitable remedies this Cort may deem appropriate. Respectfully, _____ /s/________Viteu Marcianüs Petitioner, pro se
*Please note the Amended Petition filed below*
|
|
Glüc da Dhi
Secretary of State
Posts: 6,112
Talossan Since: 5-14-2009
|
Post by Glüc da Dhi on Sept 20, 2018 12:11:54 GMT -6
Gonna need some time to find a lawyer and respond to all this.
|
|
Glüc da Dhi
Secretary of State
Posts: 6,112
Talossan Since: 5-14-2009
|
Post by Glüc da Dhi on Sept 20, 2018 12:31:54 GMT -6
Has anyone told those judges who don't read witt on a regular basis that this is happening?
|
|
|
Post by Viteu Marcianüs on Sept 20, 2018 16:33:38 GMT -6
In the Matter of VITEU MARCIANÜS PETITIONER, v Amended Petition GLÜC DA DHI, as SECRETARY OF STATE, and INDIVIDUALLY. RESPONDENT. To the Clerk of the Cort and the Esteemed Justices of the Uppemost Cort of the Kingdom of Talossa: I, Viteu Marcianüs, pro se, do hereby petition this august Cort to enjoin the Secretary of State from intervening in the Organically permissive debate occurring in any forum functioning as the Organically mandated "Hopper." To wit, the Organic Law mandates that Glüc da Dhi , as Secretary of State, "administer[] a public venue for the inspection of legislative proposals before they become bills, 'The Hopper'" (Org.L.IX1). Further, the First Covenant enumerates that "(n)o law shall exist abridging the freedom of thought, belief, opinion(,) and expression, including ... other media of communication(.) Censorship shall never exist in Talossa, every person may freely speak, write(,) and publish his (or her) sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the libelous abuse of that right" (Org.L.IX.I). It is well-settled law across common-law States, as well as civil-law States, that Parliamentarians enjoy certain parliamentary immunity, which, among other things, bars State action against all speech made during debate in the State's Legislature ( see e.g. German Constitution Art. 46 ["At no time may a Member be subjected to court proceedings or disciplinary action or otherwise called to account outside of the Bundestag for a vote case or for any speech or debate in the Bundestag or in any of its committees(.)"); United Kingdom Parliamentary Privilege, 1689 Bill of Rights, R v Chaytor, CTB v News GRoup Newspapers Ltd, (2011) EWHC 1232 QB; U.S. Const. art. I, § 6, clause 1 ("(F)or any or Debate in either House (of Congress), (the Congressperson) shall not be questioned"; Franch Constitution, article 26). Whereas, in a LAWFUL debate on the Hopper, I referred to another Member of the Cosa by their nonTalossan name, as a protected right under the Organic Law and under long-established legal doctrines the world over; and the Secretary of State has taken inOrganic action to censor my speech and subject to inorganic State Censorship by the Secretary of State, by editing my posts in the debate to conform to his standard of public etiquette, thereby inhibiting me from arguing with nuance by choosing specific language, under a rule of the overarching Talossan forum that has no Organic or statutory predicate, in what can only be described as inOrganic Censorship, from September 6, 2018 to present. Therefore, I request that this Cort issue a permanent injunction against the Chancery preventing him from editing further posts in the Hopper or the Ziu, to award monetary damages to petitioner for respondent acting under of color of law to abuse his power as a State official to deprive another of their Organic Rights not to exceed ¤1, to award costs, and for other equitable remedies this Cort may deem appropriate. Respectfully, _____ /s/________Viteu Marcianüs Petitioner, pro se
|
|
|
Post by Viteu Marcianüs on Sept 20, 2018 21:53:38 GMT -6
After a very productice, frank discussion with another, I've decided to voluntarily discontinue this action without prejudice.
|
|