APPEAL TO THE FULL BENCH OF THE UC re: 47RZ28

[Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN]

Esteemed Clerk of Court and Justices:

Please find attached the Government's brief in appeal of the majority decision in re: 47RZ28.

Kind regards,
Miestrâ A-X

Appeal in re 47RZ28.pdf (529.02 KB)

[Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă]

Estimât Avocat-Xheneral,

The Cort pü Inalt receives your appeal. A ruling on accepting the appeal shall be forthcoming.

Justice dal Nordselvă

[Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă]

Cort will come to order.

A majority of the Cort pü Inalt, having carefully deliberated, and after having examined and interpreted the applicable areas of Legeu Orgänic, we do hereby deny the appellants request to hear this appeal. The appeal presented covered more legal ground than the original trial and ruling. Amendments other than 48RZ28 were not before the Cort in the original trial and ruling. The appeal, therefore, is seen by the Cort as requiring a new trial. The Justices encourage the appellant to refile a new trial, and would, if requested to by the petitioner of any new trial on this issue, agree to sit en banc, provided the Cort accepts filed briefs and grants a new trial.

Cort stands in recess.

[Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN]

Thank you kindly, Your Honour. Can you let me and the Government know if there is a deadline for filing the revised case? You may understand that things are pretty hectic around here right now.

[Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă]

Dec 23, 2015 14:58:58 GMT -6 Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN said:

Thank you kindly, Your Honour. Can you let me and the Government know if there is a deadline for filing the revised case? You may understand that things are pretty hectic around here right now.

There exists no Organic or statutory language in regards to filing deadlines of a civil or constitutional nature. Clear timelines do exist for criminal matters. The Cort values timeliness so it is advisable to file any actions in a reasonable span of time.