|
Post by C. Carlüs Xheraltescù on Jul 17, 2013 10:40:44 GMT -6
Ironically, it's generally a bad idea to generalise like that. I don't think that word means what you think it means. Which word, because I'm pretty sure it was at least a little ironic that I was generalising by saying it's a bad idea to generalise thus.
|
|
Capt. Sir Mick Preston
Capitán of the Zouaves
Posts: 6,511
Talossan Since: 9-21-2006
Knight Since: 10-12-2010
Motto: Cuimhnichibh air na daoine bho'n d'thainig sibh
|
Post by Capt. Sir Mick Preston on Jul 17, 2013 10:51:13 GMT -6
I don't think that word means what you think it means. Which word, because I'm pretty sure it was at least a little ironic that I was generalising by saying it's a bad idea to generalise thus. Oh ! I thought you were saying that my comment was Ironic, not remarking about your own. Never mind.
|
|
|
Post by C. Carlüs Xheraltescù on Jul 17, 2013 10:52:57 GMT -6
Which word, because I'm pretty sure it was at least a little ironic that I was generalising by saying it's a bad idea to generalise thus. Oh ! I thought you were saying that my comment was Ironic, not remarking about your own. Never mind. Nope.
|
|
|
Post by Martì Prevuost on Jul 19, 2013 20:32:27 GMT -6
I would have spell checled it if i could find the spell check on here. (Ive no means to spell check it on my phone im afraid) i do apologise for all the mistakes though. And im not the best speller in the world even without the typos, which again i appologise for. (Also its a nightmare correcting mistakes manually on a touchscreen phone) but yeah. At least you see the point. I do think that we need as a nation to limit the Prime Dictates to pritty much ceremonial. And emergency summons of the Ziu. Depending on your operating system on your phone, if you are running an Android OS, I strongly suggest the app "Swiftkey" . If not, I honestly suggest you take the time to spell-check you comments. Take the time to correctly spell your words, and make a readable comment to the the posts. In not doing so, it's as if you don't care if your audience can read, much less understand your comments. It appears that you expect the reader to decipher your comments before they can respond to them. To ME, it's just like the ZRT deciding that instead of researching a Law or concept, they post something unintelligible about a law or concept., and expect the rest of us to decipher what they are saying. How about - instead of posting a message that requires the rest of us to figure out what you are saying, instead of posting gibberish - and take the time to show us respect, by a spell checked message? I think you meant to say "If not, I honestly suggest you take the time to spell-check YOUR comments." I could be wrong - it was rather difficult to figure out your unintelligible gibberish. Please take the time to show us some respect before posting such egregious errors. mag
|
|
|
Post by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu on Jul 19, 2013 20:35:21 GMT -6
I looked up "egregious" in my thesaurus to find the definition.
|
|
Capt. Sir Mick Preston
Capitán of the Zouaves
Posts: 6,511
Talossan Since: 9-21-2006
Knight Since: 10-12-2010
Motto: Cuimhnichibh air na daoine bho'n d'thainig sibh
|
Post by Capt. Sir Mick Preston on Jul 19, 2013 21:19:24 GMT -6
Depending on your operating system on your phone, if you are running an Android OS, I strongly suggest the app "Swiftkey" . If not, I honestly suggest you take the time to spell-check you comments. Take the time to correctly spell your words, and make a readable comment to the the posts. In not doing so, it's as if you don't care if your audience can read, much less understand your comments. It appears that you expect the reader to decipher your comments before they can respond to them. To ME, it's just like the ZRT deciding that instead of researching a Law or concept, they post something unintelligible about a law or concept., and expect the rest of us to decipher what they are saying. How about - instead of posting a message that requires the rest of us to figure out what you are saying, instead of posting gibberish - and take the time to show us respect, by a spell checked message? I think you meant to say "If not, I honestly suggest you take the time to spell-check YOUR comments." I could be wrong - it was rather difficult to figure out your unintelligible gibberish. Please take the time to show us some respect before posting such egregious errors. mag Is that the most important thing you could glean from my post? Of all that I posted there, you chose THAT to comment on? This, from one that cannot differentiate between "Seek" and "Desire"? I drop an "r" from a word and you call it "unintelligible gibberish" ? Thanks for posting.
|
|
Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN
Seneschal
the new Jim Hacker
Posts: 6,635
Talossan Since: 6-25-2004
Dame Since: 9-8-2012
Motto: Expulseascâ, reveneascâ
Baron Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
Duke Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
|
Post by Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN on Jul 20, 2013 3:35:25 GMT -6
Wow, Mick, it's ironic to see you offended at someone taking some minor error or quibble in your post as if it were the most important thing, and ignoring the substantive issue. Note how: "The RUMP drove two high-profile and devoted citizens out with their sad devotion to the ancient anti-dual citizenship law" turns into "Miestrâ can't be bothered reading the statute law" in your hands.
|
|
|
Post by Martì Prevuost on Jul 20, 2013 9:32:00 GMT -6
I think you meant to say "If not, I honestly suggest you take the time to spell-check YOUR comments." I could be wrong - it was rather difficult to figure out your unintelligible gibberish. Please take the time to show us some respect before posting such egregious errors. mag Is that the most important thing you could glean from my post? Of all that I posted there, you chose THAT to comment on? This, from one that cannot differentiate between "Seek" and "Desire"? I drop an "r" from a word and you call it "unintelligible gibberish" ? Thanks for posting. You're welcome. I can differentiate between "seek" and "desire". It was not the desire of the Cort to define the word "seek". Neither did the opinion seek to define the word "desire". The opinion stated the two words in question are "synonyms", a word indicating they have the same or similar meanings. mag
|
|
|
Post by Béneditsch Ardpresteir, O.SPM. on Jul 20, 2013 11:37:08 GMT -6
I looked up "egregious" in my thesaurus to find the definition. Oh! Its been part of some of my passwords for ages. Hool would know
|
|
Ián Tamorán S.H.
Chief Justice of the Uppermost Court
Proud Philosopher of Talossa
Posts: 1,401
Talossan Since: 9-27-2010
|
Post by Ián Tamorán S.H. on Jul 27, 2013 15:32:25 GMT -6
I looked up "egregious" in my thesaurus to find the definition. Oh dear. It should be dictionary not Thesaurus, as I have remarked before.
|
|
|
Post by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu on Jul 27, 2013 17:39:20 GMT -6
I was just teasing him - although it will be a while before he lives that one down!
|
|