Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN
Seneschal
the new Jim Hacker
Posts: 6,635
Talossan Since: 6-25-2004
Dame Since: 9-8-2012
Motto: Expulseascâ, reveneascâ
Baron Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
Duke Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
|
Post by Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN on Sept 17, 2012 23:46:14 GMT -6
Estimats cünfiôváes, you have SEVEN DAYS to vote on the following matter.
The final text of the bill is as follows:
So. Për, contrâ or dav? (The more we use the latter the more it becomes "Fiôvân dialect", verb form davar, or davarh in Reformed spelling).
|
|
|
Post by C. Carlüs Xheraltescù on Sept 18, 2012 2:28:25 GMT -6
Për!
|
|
|
Post by D. N. Vercáriâ on Sept 18, 2012 6:42:41 GMT -6
Contrâ
|
|
Üc R. Tärfâ
Talossan since 3-8-2005
Deputy Fiôván Secretary of State
Posts: 760
|
Post by Üc R. Tärfâ on Sept 18, 2012 6:46:59 GMT -6
Për
|
|
|
Post by Jum Txec Tric'hardsëfiglheu on Sept 18, 2012 7:04:14 GMT -6
Contrâ
|
|
|
Post by C. Carlüs Xheraltescù on Sept 18, 2012 8:25:36 GMT -6
Citizens should note that the final proposal and the original proposal differ quite a bit. I mention this because the concerns that JT raised with regards to the bill were removed in the amendments phase and yet he's voting contra on the bill. Guess you can't please some people.
|
|
|
Post by Jum Txec Tric'hardsëfiglheu on Sept 18, 2012 9:03:53 GMT -6
Citizens should note that the final proposal and the original proposal differ quite a bit. I mention this because the concerns that JT raised with regards to the bill were removed in the amendments phase and yet he's voting contra on the bill. Guess you can't please some people. No, I guess you can't...
|
|
|
Post by Ián B. Anglatzarâ on Sept 18, 2012 9:21:09 GMT -6
Austanéu.
|
|
|
Post by C. Carlüs Xheraltescù on Sept 18, 2012 9:21:31 GMT -6
Citizens should note that the final proposal and the original proposal differ quite a bit. I mention this because the concerns that JT raised with regards to the bill were removed in the amendments phase and yet he's voting contra on the bill. Guess you can't please some people. No, I guess you can't... What I'm getting at is that I addressed your concerns and you still seem unhappy with the bill. Is there any particular reason why? (please don't misinterpret the tone of my post here, I'm not trying to be confrontational. I'm merely curious)
|
|
|
Post by Jum Txec Tric'hardsëfiglheu on Sept 21, 2012 16:02:08 GMT -6
My vote still stands, and I wish to exercise my right to vote without having to explain why I voted a certain way.
|
|
|
Post by C. Carlüs Xheraltescù on Sept 22, 2012 3:03:43 GMT -6
Okay misery guts, I was only asking out of curiosity. I didn't expect you to change your vote. I just though that in a legislative assembly it's generally more productive as a whole if people offer the odd enlightenment from time to time.
|
|
|
Post by Ián B. Anglatzarâ on Sept 22, 2012 11:33:45 GMT -6
Yes, Carlüs is correct. You seem to mix up being a voter with being a legislator. Refusing to explain is one thing, sounding offended that you were asked is another. This is lawmaking, not an election.
|
|
|
Post by Jum Txec Tric'hardsëfiglheu on Sept 22, 2012 14:04:53 GMT -6
I wasn't offended that I was asked, just that I was pointed out for voting a certain way.
|
|
|
Post by Audrada Rôibeardét on Sept 22, 2012 16:49:34 GMT -6
I vote Dav.
And let me say, I'm a little disappointed in Ián's vote of "austanéu". Get on the bandwagon! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Jum Txec Tric'hardsëfiglheu on Sept 22, 2012 17:55:48 GMT -6
Only reason I didn't say was because I don't believe in an honours system, and had I have said that, it would probably have opened up a can of worms over whether an honours system is necessary. Also, I'm sure our legislative assembly does provide some enlightenment from time to time, I mean, come on let's be realistic here. Someone please remind me why Fiova works through direct democracy again? Ián, I'm sorry for not being vocal enough through this process, I was unaware to vote without explanation was a faux pas, perhaps that is something that can be legislated.
|
|