Post by Üc R. Tärfâ on Jul 17, 2012 1:54:45 GMT -6
As I've said elsewhere I voluntered to take care of the closing of the loopholes that the Secretary of State's election and the Nomination of an Adjudicator's confirmation recently highlighted. My concerns were:
After a brief consultation with our Capitán to share our views, I'll submit here for discussion this fixing pack made of two different acts, one intended to amend the Standing Orders and the other to amend the Constitution.
docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1EWBpo_VqKiS6ubNnw9HHCrH9lKfKekEZui-WHNauwmE
Have your say!
- to not reduce the Túischac'hqab to a mere cerimonial office (which would have been the result if we were presuming that every citizen could call for a vote and if we were presuming that after the 7 days period the act has de jure passed or failed.);
- as the General Assembly's nature of a direct democratic body and an always sitting one, the Túischac'hqab is an office we need to be as active as possible;
- our Constitution (Fiôvâ Const. § 13.1) clearly enumerates in an exclusive way the situations when a Deputy could fulfil the functions of the titular Officer (absence, and provisional replacement in cases of resignation or dismissal), and clearly states when an Officer should be considered absent (if [he] fail to confirm [his] presence to the General Assembly within seven (7 days of being called upon to do so.)) which could lenghten in an abnormal way the legislative process;
- Org.10.6 provides for a mechanism which enables to presume the promulgation of laws by the King that for the Clark system applied by the Ziu is de facto a ten days period, but applied to the General Assembly system could be longer, even 30 days.
After a brief consultation with our Capitán to share our views, I'll submit here for discussion this fixing pack made of two different acts, one intended to amend the Standing Orders and the other to amend the Constitution.
docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1EWBpo_VqKiS6ubNnw9HHCrH9lKfKekEZui-WHNauwmE
Have your say!