Ian Plätschisch
Senator for Maritiimi-Maxhestic
Posts: 4,001
Talossan Since: 3-21-2015
|
Post by Ian Plätschisch on Oct 30, 2017 16:28:33 GMT -6
Having thought it over more, I still think it would be best if you made the code first and then we repealed the current Title I, so we wouldn't have to deal with "temporarily" repealing something. Nothing is stopping you from working with the Interior Minister (who will be me) to make this code right now. I'm apprehensive, as a Full-Time Graduate student, into spending the hundreds of hours to delevop something I have seen most in the Zui could care less about having. If we have a military, we need a real Military Code... if it's not something anyone but two or three people care about, why have one. I'll spearhead the development of UMCO, but not till after the project is approved. I tried, using my knowledge and skills as an aide to a two-star and as the State G-1 for my State's Guard to draft the original NOCA and was told it was too long. I feel I wasted a ton of time and effort on the whole effort, finding it frustrating to try and develop something nobody either wants or understands. Advice as to where I should go from here or just hang it up? The statute referenced by Sir Cresti basically means that no one has to approve the creation of a code; it will go into effect as soon as promulgated by the Interior Minister. If you make the code, and I (as Interior Minister) approve of it, I guarantee I will promulgate it and sponsor a bill to delete duplicated provisions in el Lexhatx. I think that is all the approval you would need. I'm sure I speak for everyone when I say I appreciate your efforts. Your previous code is a really good starting point for a set of military regulations.
|
|
|
Post by Þon Txoteu É. Davinescu on Oct 30, 2017 18:35:57 GMT -6
I'm apprehensive, as a Full-Time Graduate student, into spending the hundreds of hours to delevop something I have seen most in the Zui could care less about having. If we have a military, we need a real Military Code... if it's not something anyone but two or three people care about, why have one. I'll spearhead the development of UMCO, but not till after the project is approved. I tried, using my knowledge and skills as an aide to a two-star and as the State G-1 for my State's Guard to draft the original NOCA and was told it was too long. I feel I wasted a ton of time and effort on the whole effort, finding it frustrating to try and develop something nobody either wants or understands. Advice as to where I should go from here or just hang it up? The statute referenced by Sir Cresti basically means that no one has to approve the creation of a code; it will go into effect as soon as promulgated by the Interior Minister. If you make the code, and I (as Interior Minister) approve of it, I guarantee I will promulgate it and sponsor a bill to delete duplicated provisions in el Lexhatx. I think that is all the approval you would need. I'm sure I speak for everyone when I say I appreciate your efforts. Your previous code is a really good starting point for a set of military regulations. I'll put the UCMO together. I figure it'll take about 6 weeks. I just don't want to waste my time. I wrote Policy & Procedures for tons of organizations. If this is something you think we need and would be worthwhile... I'll get on it. I'll also remove, once more, my request to Clark NOCA.
|
|
Sir C. M. Siervicül
Posts: 9,636
Talossan Since: 8-13-2005
Knight Since: 7-28-2007
Motto: Nonnisi Deo serviendum
|
Post by Sir C. M. Siervicül on Oct 31, 2017 5:19:31 GMT -6
I'll put the UCMO together. I figure it'll take about 6 weeks. I just don't want to waste my time. I wrote Policy & Procedures for tons of organizations. If this is something you think we need and would be worthwhile... I'll get on it. I'll also remove, once more, my request to Clark NOCA. You could start small, with just rank structure, enlistment/commissioning procedures, and some basic terminology (mostly stuff that was in your original draft and/or current law), and expand it over time.
|
|