Ian Plätschisch
Senator for Maritiimi-Maxhestic
Posts: 4,001
Talossan Since: 3-21-2015
|
Post by Ian Plätschisch on Sept 16, 2016 16:54:14 GMT -6
WHEREAS The Organic Law has many provisions which would best be moved to statutory law, and
WHEREAS A simpler, clearer Organic Law would encourage more people to read it, which would result in a more knowledgeable citizenry, and
WHEREAS Section 4 of Article X is redundant given the public's "right to know" in the Fourth Covenant, and given that reporting on the votes of the Ziu are already a duty of the SoS according to Lexh.C.1.1, and
WHEREAS Section 7 is also redundant, because Section 5 says the same thing, and
THEREFORE Section 4 of Article X of the Organic Law, which currently reads;
is hereby repealed.
FURTHERMORE Section 7 of Article X of the Organic Law, which currently reads;
is hereby repealed.
The other sections of Article X are renumbered accordingly.
Uréu q'estadra så; Ian Plätschisch (MC-MRPT)
|
|
Sir C. M. Siervicül
Posts: 9,636
Talossan Since: 8-13-2005
Knight Since: 7-28-2007
Motto: Nonnisi Deo serviendum
|
Post by Sir C. M. Siervicül on Sept 19, 2016 6:11:34 GMT -6
I like this.
|
|
Glüc da Dhi
Secretary of State
Posts: 6,112
Talossan Since: 5-14-2009
|
Post by Glüc da Dhi on Oct 18, 2016 10:22:33 GMT -6
Woah, I see a big problem here: This bill repeals Article X, Section 7 on the assumption that Section 5 says the same thing, but it does not. It does not say anything about amendments. In factor, before section 7 was added, AUS votes would count the same as CON votes for amendments!!! (on the basis that a supermajority means 67% PER of the total number of voters, rather than just the PER and CON votes)
|
|
Sir C. M. Siervicül
Posts: 9,636
Talossan Since: 8-13-2005
Knight Since: 7-28-2007
Motto: Nonnisi Deo serviendum
|
Post by Sir C. M. Siervicül on Oct 18, 2016 17:49:54 GMT -6
Woah, I see a big problem here: This bill repeals Article X, Section 7 on the assumption that Section 5 says the same thing, but it does not. It does not say anything about amendments. In factor, before section 7 was added, AUS votes would count the same as CON votes for amendments!!! (on the basis that a supermajority means 67% PER of the total number of voters, rather than just the PER and CON votes) Sigh. Fair point. I'm leaning toward voting against this amendment now.
|
|