|
|
Post by C. Carlüs Xheraltescù on Apr 1, 2016 19:20:26 GMT -6
Please feel free to drop in and ask any question you might have on which way I intend to vote. I intend to publish beforehand the way I intend to vote in each Clark so that you have an opportunity to question or petition my office to do otherwise. I am allied with the Free Democrats and thus I sit in their caucus, so I can bring up any issues you have there as well.
Have a good day!
|
|
|
|
Post by C. Carlüs Xheraltescù on Apr 1, 2016 19:30:29 GMT -6
49RZ1 - I intend to vote PER, it's clear to me that things are not quite working at the moment and this seems like a sensible reform.
49RZ2 - This seems uncontroversial to me, and thus I intend to vote PER on this also.
49RZ3 - This is difficult, I think it would be better not to interfere with the work currently being done by the Royal Commission. I think the way the bill is worded, it lets the King off the hook for potentially not doing his job. We should either push for automatic dissolution or keep it as it is, rather than giving the King the option of just not doing his job. As it stands, I intend to vote CONTRA.
|
|
Üc R. Tärfâ
Talossan since 3-8-2005
Deputy Fiôván Secretary of State
Posts: 760 
|
Post by Üc R. Tärfâ on Apr 18, 2016 4:14:38 GMT -6
Drept Þonoravál Senatôr C. Carlüs Xheraltescù, I'd like to know your intentions regarding the catchment area reform that is still being discussed in the Ziu, particularly regarding the future of the fiôván one. |
|
|
|
Post by C. Carlüs Xheraltescù on Apr 18, 2016 4:41:48 GMT -6
I have some small concerns with it, but overall I'm quite content with the bill and so I'll probably be voting for it.
|
|
Üc R. Tärfâ
Talossan since 3-8-2005
Deputy Fiôván Secretary of State
Posts: 760
|
Post by Üc R. Tärfâ on May 2, 2016 23:53:54 GMT -6
Just to let you know that I'm not happy with the Catchment area of Fiôvâ in the current bill. The area isn't historically significant for immigrants, and I'm afraid it would dry out our Province.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ián B. Anglatzarâ on May 3, 2016 1:57:49 GMT -6
What would you suggest that still achieves the goal of keeping assignment fairly geographically contiguous? I agree that in the current bill, it's only Australia, Brazil, and New Zealand that can be expected to provide Fiôvâ with immigrants.
|
|
Üc R. Tärfâ
Talossan since 3-8-2005
Deputy Fiôván Secretary of State
Posts: 760
|
Post by Üc R. Tärfâ on May 3, 2016 6:55:34 GMT -6
What would you suggest that still achieves the goal of keeping assignment fairly geographically contiguous? I agree that in the current bill, it's only Australia, Brazil, and New Zealand that can be expected to provide Fiôvâ with immigrants. And potentially South Africa too, however it's a small pool. The main sources of immigrants historically were North America and Western Europe: Fiova would be the only Province without any of them; and among the "new" 3 overseas Provinces (Fiova, Cézembre, and You-know-which-one) the only one without a part of (western) Europe. (BTW Fiova in this bill is the one with assignment " less fairly geographically contiguous" because its components are scattered around the world and for a "geographical" reason because there are lots on insular countries). Suggestions: maybe restore american states in the catchement area? |
|
|
|
Post by Gödafrïeu Válcadác’h on Dec 20, 2016 15:14:05 GMT -6
Greets, everyone! It is interesting to see the last time I was a Senator in the Kingdom, I represented Maricopa and resigned my seat...on 1 June 2004! Hopefully, my tenure (however long it may last) will end in far-less dramatic circumstances.
It's great to be back in the Senäts, and it's an honor to represent the people of Fiovâ. If you have any comments or concerns on whatever, please feel free to PM me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gödafrïeu Válcadác’h on May 10, 2018 19:20:18 GMT -6
I have been made Mencei, and am honored to serve.
|
|
