|
Post by Adm. T.M. Asmourescu, O. Ben. on Feb 11, 2016 8:21:29 GMT -6
Neither I nor Sir Cresti have made any statement even tangentially alluding to this case in the RUMP group where Dama Litz might have inadvertently seen it. As to your other question, I refer you to my brief (or any beginner book on law). I'll consult the law librarian at work as to beginner books on law which condone knowingly making false statements in court. When I find one that excuses your lying I'll review and get back to you.
|
|
|
Post by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu on Feb 11, 2016 8:42:34 GMT -6
Wow, where do you work that you have a law library there? I don't even know what sort of work you do, actually.
|
|
|
Post by Adm. T.M. Asmourescu, O. Ben. on Feb 11, 2016 9:00:55 GMT -6
Feel free to find my LinkedIn profile (I don't post links on Witt to my non-Talossan name, my early Witt posts do a fine enough job of breaking down that barrier for me).
In addition to my workplace law library I also have access to the county law library which is one building over from my office. All New York counties have free law libraries for public use (some smaller counties share space with neighboring counties, however).
|
|
|
Post by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu on Feb 11, 2016 9:03:29 GMT -6
If you don't want to disclose your profession, that's fine. I was just curious. Not a lot of non-lawyer workplaces have law libraries in them. I wish my school did -- it would save me some trips to the local one!
|
|
|
Post by Adm. T.M. Asmourescu, O. Ben. on Feb 11, 2016 9:12:07 GMT -6
If you don't want to disclose your profession, that's fine. I was just curious. Not a lot of non-lawyer workplaces have law libraries in them. I wish my school did! My LinkedIn profile is readily available under my non-Talossan name with specifics. It is there for the world to see just by searching said name. I work at a university with a law school (among other professional schools). I'm just trying to avoid tying my Talossan and non-Talossan names in search engine results.
|
|
|
Post by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu on Feb 11, 2016 9:14:37 GMT -6
Oh, I wasn't asking specifics. You actually just answered what I was curious about -- you work at a university. Cool. I used to work at one, too.
|
|
|
Post by Marti-Pair Furxheir S.H. on Feb 11, 2016 11:59:58 GMT -6
*googles definition of perjury*
|
|
|
Post by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu on Feb 11, 2016 12:18:15 GMT -6
I think I would be willing to subscribe to an MPF-based search engine.
*talking to his phone* "MPF, what is the bbcode for making a table?"
|
|
|
Post by Adm. T.M. Asmourescu, O. Ben. on Feb 11, 2016 12:38:36 GMT -6
Followed up by:
To which Dame Litz stated:
The problem is that Sir Alexandreu presented evidence of Justice Nordselva making an off-handed comment to Iason Taiwos (who, for the record, is not the Attorney-General) and the fact that both Justice Nordselva and the Attorney-General have stated that Justice Nordselva declines to comment on court matters with the Attorney-General.
So, we really have two possibilities:
1. Sir Alexandreu is a liar and perjurer
2. Sir Alexandreu is so blinded by his political ambition that he is willing to denigrate the integrity of the courts to further his goals
Justice Nordselva talks to a lot of people. As do all of the Justices. It is improper for the Justices to discuss a case ex parte. But this is a small nation and many people wear many hats.
The fact is, if Justice Nordselva is to be forced to recuse himself simply because he participates in a private group, then we must immediately turn with suspicion toward Dame Litz who is known to frequent Sir Alexandreu's private group. And, in such cases, we can really have no justices at all.
Sir Alexandreu stated, under penalty of perjury, that he had evidence. He does not. He has innuendo. He has a complex tapestry woven in his own imagination around a series of perfectly innocent statements (the bulk of them with a person not party to the case and discussing a matter that is not relevant to the present parties). Sir Alexandreu's current witch hunt is nothing more than political butt-hurt over having no standing to bring his "lawsuit" and having it be ridiculed for the drivel it is.
You sir, are a liar. And when you lie in court, under penalty of perjury, you are a perjurer. And no law book, beginner or otherwise, will vindicate you of your reprehensible conduct before the courts.
|
|
|
Post by Marti-Pair Furxheir S.H. on Feb 11, 2016 12:39:03 GMT -6
I think I would be willing to subscribe to an MPF-based search engine. *talking to his phone* "MPF, what is the bbcode for making a table?"
|
|
|
Post by Marti-Pair Furxheir S.H. on Feb 11, 2016 12:43:01 GMT -6
Sir Alexandreu stated, under penalty of perjury, that he had evidence. He does not. He has innuendo. He has a complex tapestry woven in his own imagination around a series of perfectly innocent statements (the bulk of them with a person not party to the case and discussing a matter that is not relevant to the present parties). Sir Alexandreu's current witch hunt is nothing more than political butt-hurt over having no standing to bring his "lawsuit" and having it be ridiculed for the drivel it is. You sir, are a liar. And when you lie in court, under penalty of perjury, you are a perjurer. And no law book, beginner or otherwise, will vindicate you of your reprehensible conduct before the courts.
|
|
Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN
Seneschal
the new Jim Hacker
Posts: 6,635
Talossan Since: 6-25-2004
Dame Since: 9-8-2012
Motto: Expulseascâ, reveneascâ
Baron Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
Duke Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
|
Post by Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN on Feb 11, 2016 12:45:38 GMT -6
Ooh, do "disingenuous", that's my favourite.
|
|
|
Post by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu on Feb 11, 2016 12:46:11 GMT -6
I think I would be willing to subscribe to an MPF-based search engine. *talking to his phone* "MPF, what is the bbcode for making a table?" I want this app. Admiral, sorry, not going to participate in your extrajudicial publicity campaign. I can only say that I'm fairly confident I understand at least a modicum about ex parte communication and appearance of bias and perjury, and that I believe that the judicial process will vindicate me. I wish you all the best as you assist the Avocat-Xheneral.
|
|
Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN
Seneschal
the new Jim Hacker
Posts: 6,635
Talossan Since: 6-25-2004
Dame Since: 9-8-2012
Motto: Expulseascâ, reveneascâ
Baron Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
Duke Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
|
Post by Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN on Feb 11, 2016 13:12:22 GMT -6
Anyway, in the interests of proving that reasonable people can talk reasonably: Sir Alexandreu and I had discussions yesterday on the possibility of a settlement of his request for standing re: the current Petition. These discussions are ongoing but have produced no result so far.
|
|
|
Post by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu on Feb 11, 2016 13:18:22 GMT -6
Yes, things are moving along. I am optimistic, and grateful for the reasonable discussion with the Avocat-Xheneral.
|
|