|
Post by Magniloqueu Épiqeu da Lhiun on Dec 8, 2015 18:13:41 GMT -6
Hello, citizens of Maritiimi-Maxhestic and soon-also-Vuode-maybe-yes-no-who-knows? Here, you can find the current clark with TEN bills, this month! www.talossa.ca/files/clark.php?cosa=48&clark=6Let's break it down, eh? RZ29 - Will vote PER, do I hear otherwise? RZ30 - Sets Territorial Subdivisions straight. I am no geography genius, don't know nothing 'bout that. If I don't hear an objection to this bill, I will vote PER. RZ31 - Database becomes ours, finally. PER, unless I am told otherwise by a majority. RZ32 - I find this very funny, and will PER it. RZ33 - A lot of back-and-forth, but I do like paperwork so much. I will vote PER on the Caught in the Act Act. RZ34 - YES! Congratulations to the BHAID on its first-to-be donation! PERRZ35 - PER, like last time. RZ36 - Those (i), (ii), and (iii)s bothered me every time. I guess there is no harm in changing them. PERRZ37 and RZ38 - My bills. I really like them. I will PER them, unless you convince me otherwise! Contact me! (I will be out of town from Thursday to Tuesday; you can contact me via twitter: @epicdalhiun but I will check this thread once I come back, or even maybe while I am in Hamburg!)
|
|
Ian Plätschisch
Senator for Maritiimi-Maxhestic
Posts: 4,001
Talossan Since: 3-21-2015
|
Post by Ian Plätschisch on Dec 8, 2015 18:20:11 GMT -6
I don't like 33. So much needless paper, and money needed to ship the needless paper. The King signs a copy already, and if we really want a record, we should print out el Lexhatx at the end of each term like AD suggested.
|
|
|
Post by M.T. Patritz da Biondeu on Dec 8, 2015 19:14:36 GMT -6
33 holds the King accountable to actually be signing the bills and storing them appropriately. Had anyone seen if he is doing this?
Getting the signed bills protect the integrity of the law. If all electronic sources disappeared we could have a preserved copy of our law in order to begin anew.
|
|
Ian Plätschisch
Senator for Maritiimi-Maxhestic
Posts: 4,001
Talossan Since: 3-21-2015
|
Post by Ian Plätschisch on Dec 8, 2015 20:03:12 GMT -6
If all electronic sources disappeared we could have a preserved copy of our law in order to begin anew. A preserved copy of a bunch of fragmented changes to the law?
Triplicate records don't triple the efficacy of the preservation. If the internet goes out and two of the people's houses burned down before we could get a replacement, behold! They are also stored at a third house!
If accountability is really the issue, why don't we just have the King post pictures of himself signing bills into law every Clark?
|
|
|
Post by Sir Alexandreu Davinescu on Dec 8, 2015 20:36:30 GMT -6
33 is busy-work, and I'm going to oppose it as well, I'm afraid. It has no real useful purpose (there are literally a dozen easier ways to preserve legal records).
|
|
|
Post by Magniloqueu Épiqeu da Lhiun on Dec 19, 2015 5:21:09 GMT -6
Thank you for your feedback. I voted per on everything except RZ33, on which I voted Contra, according to the feedback I have received.
|
|