|
Post by Françal Ian Lux on Sept 25, 2015 10:13:14 GMT -6
Can someone check this for accuracy and relevance? quizlet.com/_1k879uA couple of questions: why are there two words for both "with" and "to listen, to hear"? Muitas graschcias!
|
|
|
Post by Magniloqueu Épiqeu da Lhiun on Sept 25, 2015 11:00:22 GMT -6
Are there not three? Avetz, cün AND cumpair?
|
|
Sir C. M. Siervicül
Posts: 9,636
Talossan Since: 8-13-2005
Knight Since: 7-28-2007
Motto: Nonnisi Deo serviendum
|
Post by Sir C. M. Siervicül on Sept 25, 2015 15:23:42 GMT -6
why are there two words for both "with" and "to listen, to hear"? I've been planning on starting a discussion about this topic on the CÚG list and here, as it's a topic I've been wrestling with for a long time. I'm not on my computer today, but hopefully by tomorrow. In the meantime, for relevant background information you should read Ben's language page (archived) and Ben's essay ¿Qet Isch el Glhetg Talossan?.
|
|
|
Post by Françal Ian Lux on Sept 25, 2015 15:56:27 GMT -6
Are there not three? Avetz, cün AND cumpair? Epic, may I bother you to check out that link on Quizlet? Tell me what you think and check it for accuracy of you can while you're at it lol
|
|
|
Post by Françal Ian Lux on Sept 25, 2015 15:57:12 GMT -6
why are there two words for both "with" and "to listen, to hear"? I've been planning on starting a discussion about this topic on the CÚG list and here, as it's a topic I've been wrestling with for a long time. I'm not on my computer today, but hopefully by tomorrow. In the meantime, for relevant background information you should read Ben's language page (archived) and Ben's essay ¿Qet Isch el Glhetg Talossan?. I will check those out. Also what do you think of the vocab list? Whenever you have time
|
|
|
Post by Françal Ian Lux on Sept 26, 2015 20:51:20 GMT -6
Difference between "per" vs "evit" for English FOR?
|
|
Sir C. M. Siervicül
Posts: 9,636
Talossan Since: 8-13-2005
Knight Since: 7-28-2007
Motto: Nonnisi Deo serviendum
|
Post by Sir C. M. Siervicül on Sept 27, 2015 20:31:19 GMT -6
Difference between "per" vs "evit" for English FOR? The difference is just this: per is Romance while evit is Breton. Evit was adopted during the height of Ben's Celto-Berber phase of Talossan, and was actively used only for a brief period in 1985. Per was used before and after that. The other word for "for" is cair, which like per is Romance in origin. Cair is used for "for" in the sense of "because" or "since".
|
|