|
Post by Txosuè Éiric Rôibeardescù on Aug 28, 2015 16:31:35 GMT -6
Gluc is just an example in this matter
|
|
|
Post by Marti-Pair Furxheir S.H. on Aug 29, 2015 3:34:54 GMT -6
...well either way gluc isn't happy with me... voting PER on all 3, one or two of which he doesn't agree with... or not voting at all... could it at least be an abstain on all 3 as i attempted to vote? The way I see it, there are only 2 possibilities: 1 ) The post you made was valid vote, and as such, you voted per on all three. 2 ) The post you made wasn't a valid vote, and as such, you didn't vote at all. Anything else doesn't follow any of the 2 legal options...
|
|
|
Post by Danihel Txechescu on Aug 30, 2015 22:27:48 GMT -6
Voted on the wrong thread, it's invalid. Trust me, I'm Sagittarius, I know of all justicy things. A lesson has been learned. Let's move on.
|
|
Gaglhen Fortaleça
Citizen of Talossa
Glory to the Proletariat
Posts: 394
Talossan Since: 4-23-2015
|
Post by Gaglhen Fortaleça on Aug 31, 2015 5:03:29 GMT -6
*Gavel raps on the hard oak table of the SoS, the verdict has been carried, your fate sealed... foreveeeeerrrrrr*
|
|
|
Post by Marti-Pair Furxheir S.H. on Aug 31, 2015 6:06:51 GMT -6
*Gavel raps on the hard oak table of the SoS, Nobody hits my oak table... nobody. It risks tipping off one of my 9 computer monitors...
|
|
Gaglhen Fortaleça
Citizen of Talossa
Glory to the Proletariat
Posts: 394
Talossan Since: 4-23-2015
|
Post by Gaglhen Fortaleça on Aug 31, 2015 13:12:20 GMT -6
*sheepishly* sorry Mr. Furxheir, I'll be sure to use your non-oak table the next time...
|
|
Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă
Puisne (Associate) Justice of the Uppermost Court
Fraichetz dels punts, es non dels mürs
Posts: 4,063
Talossan Since: 9-23-2012
|
Post by Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă on Aug 31, 2015 15:28:50 GMT -6
There are three legal outcomes: 1) The SoS recognizes your votes, 2) a court ruling is issued, or 3) no votes are registered.
|
|
|
Post by Txosuè Éiric Rôibeardescù on Sept 7, 2015 10:46:08 GMT -6
well... would my vote on these bills have changed the outcome? if so the first too may be required, if not number 3 would probably be best
|
|
|
Post by Magniloqueu Épiqeu da Lhiun on Sept 7, 2015 11:02:50 GMT -6
Okay, Sen. Rôibeardescù, you are acting like what the Turks call: “Hem suçlu, hem güçlü.” (“Guilty, yet adamant.”) You have failed to vote properly, and now you require that your mistake be — illegally, in my opinion — disregarded, and your vote counted, when there was no real vote to be counted. Just, for once, be quiet, and sit back down.
|
|
Sir C. M. Siervicül
Posts: 9,636
Talossan Since: 8-13-2005
Knight Since: 7-28-2007
Motto: Nonnisi Deo serviendum
|
Post by Sir C. M. Siervicül on Sept 7, 2015 11:14:11 GMT -6
when there was no real vote to be counted I think that's what he just said: option 3, no votes registered.
|
|
|
Post by Magniloqueu Épiqeu da Lhiun on Sept 7, 2015 11:47:56 GMT -6
when there was no real vote to be counted I think that's what he just said: option 3, no votes registered. No; here, too, he wanted a special treatment. IF his votes had changed anything, were they counted, he wanted the votes counted, and IF NOT, he would not go through the hassle of a Cort challenge.
|
|
Ian Plätschisch
Senator for Maritiimi-Maxhestic
Posts: 4,001
Talossan Since: 3-21-2015
|
Post by Ian Plätschisch on Sept 7, 2015 11:55:47 GMT -6
I think that's what he just said: option 3, no votes registered. No; here, too, he wanted a special treatment. IF his votes had changed anything, were they counted, he wanted the votes counted, and IF NOT, he would not go through the hassle of a Cort challenge. Yes...I don't think a recognition of the votes or a court case would be "required" even if the votes had changed an outcome.
|
|