|
|
Post by Marti-Pair Furxheir S.H. on Sept 1, 2014 18:39:34 GMT -6
They are here: www.talossa.ca/files/election_result.phpIn short: RUMP: 40 votes, 78 seats MRPT: 23 votes, 45 seats ZRT: 16 votes, 31 seats LIB: 10 votes, 19 seats PROG: 7 votes, 13 seats (the rounded method yields 201 seats and the PROG has the lowest decimal part over .50 so they only get 13 and not 14) PC: 6 votes, 12 seats TWP: 1 vote, 2 seats The amendment passes. |
|
Trotxâ
Talossan since 10-17-2005; Knight since 11-5-2006
Deo duce, ferro comitante
Posts: 1,574
|
Post by Trotxâ on Sept 1, 2014 18:42:38 GMT -6
MPF - Thanks for your work on this. In Chrome, the column headings are skewed. It looks like some info is not displayed. Hope you enjoyed your movie. T |
|
Glüc da Dhi
Secretary of State
Posts: 6,112
Talossan Since: 5-14-2009
|
Post by Glüc da Dhi on Sept 1, 2014 18:44:14 GMT -6
Did you make sure to count party votes for the senate part for candidates as well. Some of the senatorial results simply cannot be true.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lupulüc "Lupüc" da Fhöglha on Sept 1, 2014 18:48:12 GMT -6
So no majority government for the RUMP, and the MRPT are second. I am happy.
PS: Someone needs to sticky this thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marti-Pair Furxheir S.H. on Sept 1, 2014 18:49:33 GMT -6
They are here: www.talossa.ca/files/election_result.phpIn short: RUMP: 40 votes, 78 seats MRPT: 23 votes, 45 seats ZRT: 16 votes, 30 seats LIB: 10 votes, 19 seats PROG: 7 votes, 13 seats (the rounded method yields 201 seats and the PROG has the lowest decimal part over .50 so they only get 13 and not 14) PC: 6 votes, 12 seats TWP: 1 vote, 2 seats The amendment passes. Speaking as an individual, I have to note that without the RUMP, we need FOUR parties to make a coalition. The RUMP for a 2 party coalition would need either the ZRT or the MRPT... |
|
Sir C. M. Siervicül
Posts: 9,636
Talossan Since: 8-13-2005
Knight Since: 7-28-2007
Motto: Nonnisi Deo serviendum
|
Post by Sir C. M. Siervicül on Sept 1, 2014 18:50:55 GMT -6
Did you make sure to count party votes for the senate part for candidates as well. Some of the senatorial results simply cannot be true. It looks like the senatorial results include only the public ballots, not secret ballots. |
|
|
|
Post by Marti-Pair Furxheir S.H. on Sept 1, 2014 18:50:57 GMT -6
MPF - Thanks for your work on this. In Chrome, the column headings are skewed. It looks like some info is not displayed. Hope you enjoyed your movie. T Weird... on my chrome it worked. Movie still running... it's Days of Thunder... |
|
Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă
Puisne (Associate) Justice of the Uppermost Court
Fraichetz dels punts, es non dels mürs
Posts: 4,063 
Talossan Since: 9-23-2012
|
Post by Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă on Sept 1, 2014 18:51:39 GMT -6
Did you make sure to count party votes for the senate part for candidates as well. Some of the senatorial results simply cannot be true. Look on the right side where you will see party line votes for Senate. |
|
|
|
Post by Marti-Pair Furxheir S.H. on Sept 1, 2014 18:51:57 GMT -6
Did you make sure to count party votes for the senate part for candidates as well. Some of the senatorial results simply cannot be true. It looks like the senatorial results include only the public ballots, not secret ballots. I will check tomorrow, but it should include all. |
|
Glüc da Dhi
Secretary of State
Posts: 6,112
Talossan Since: 5-14-2009
|
Post by Glüc da Dhi on Sept 1, 2014 18:54:39 GMT -6
Did you make sure to count party votes for the senate part for candidates as well. Some of the senatorial results simply cannot be true. Look on the right side where you will see party line votes for Senate. No, those are the votes for the provicial assembly. Anyway, Im 100% certain the senatorial results cant be true. |
|
|
|
Post by M.T. Patritz da Biondeu on Sept 1, 2014 18:57:30 GMT -6
I think MM Senate votes are wrong. I voted for Mani, yet it says he only has one vote. I hardly believe that he didn't vote for himself.
|
|
Sir C. M. Siervicül
Posts: 9,636
Talossan Since: 8-13-2005
Knight Since: 7-28-2007
Motto: Nonnisi Deo serviendum
|
Post by Sir C. M. Siervicül on Sept 1, 2014 18:57:34 GMT -6
I will check tomorrow, but it should include all. The M-M results show 3 votes for Preston and 1 vote for da Lhiun. Those are all attributable to public ballots. So all 4 of the voters who cast public ballots voted for a candidate by name, but not one of the 13 voters who cast secret ballots voted in the Senäts race? |
|
Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă
Puisne (Associate) Justice of the Uppermost Court
Fraichetz dels punts, es non dels mürs
Posts: 4,063
Talossan Since: 9-23-2012
|
Post by Dr. Txec dal Nordselvă on Sept 1, 2014 19:00:24 GMT -6
I will check tomorrow, but it should include all. The M-M results show 3 votes for Preston and 1 vote for da Lhiun. Those are all attributable to public ballots. So all 4 of the voters who cast public ballots voted for a candidate by name, but not one of the 13 voters who cast secret ballots voted in the Senäts race? Yeah that can't be correct. |
|
Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN
Seneschal
the new Jim Hacker
Posts: 6,635
Talossan Since: 6-25-2004
Dame Since: 9-8-2012
Motto: Expulseascâ, reveneascâ
Baron Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
Duke Since: Feudal titles are for gimps
|
Post by Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN on Sept 1, 2014 19:01:28 GMT -6
First of all, I'd like to express my grumpiness at Sir Tamorán dàl Navâ for not getting around to voting. Second of all, I'd like to express my gratitude for all ZRT voters. Our vote has gone down in absolute and in relative terms since last time. Clearly, the Liberals and the Progressive ate away at our vote; the ZRT vote from last time was therefore a general reformist one rather than a Republican one. Well; at least we now know that 15% of Talossans remain staunch republicans, putting us as the third largest party. ¡La luciâ continua! Thirdly, I would like to commiserate with my opponents of the RUMP - while, at the same time, noting that the continued slide in their vote means that Talossan democracy is healthy. The ruling party can be replaced. Fourthly, I would like to declare that something is bloody screwy with the Senäts results. Who actually won in Vuode? Did cxhn. da Lhiun really not even vote for himself for Senator? The only unambiguous result (apart from my own) seems to be that Lüc da Schir is the new Senator from Benito, and I welcome the new ModRad leader (and prime candidate for new Seneschál?!?) Fifthly, the ZRT seems to have won a provincial seat in M-M, where we have no current members. We are currently in negotiations to sort this out. Sixthly - and most importantly - the ZRT declares its preference for an incoming Government to be a four-party coalition of the outgoing Government parties (ModRad/ZRT), the Liberal Congress and the Progressives. Although if the RUMP want to offer me bribes to prop up a government under Sir Alexandreu, you've got a couple of days to offer them.  ¡Sa vivadra Talossa! ¡Sa vivadra Talossa democrätic! |
|
|
|
Post by Iustì Carlüs Canun on Sept 1, 2014 19:02:13 GMT -6
PS: Someone needs to sticky this thread. Stuck. |
|
DEPUTY Minister of Culture 
MC for the 47th Cosa
La C'ho'aliziun per la Mhamtenençù dal Müdada dels gConsonants
